Michela Maria Tincani


Publications:


"Teacher Quality in Public and Private Schools Under a Voucher System: The Case of Chile", Journal of Labor Economics , 2016, vol. 34, no. 2
(with J. Behrman, P. Todd and K. Wolpin)

Download accepted version

Chile is unusual in having long-term experience with nationwide school vouchers and a large private school sector. A key criticism of school voucher systems is that they make it easier for private schools to attract better teachers to the detriment of public schools. This paper uses longitudinal household and teacher survey data from Chile to develop and estimate a discrete choice dynamic programming (DCDP) model of teacher and non-teacher labor supply decisions and to explore how wage policies affect the composition of the teacher labor force in both public and private schools. In the model, individuals first decide whether to get a teaching degree and then choose annually from among five work/home sector alternatives. Empirical results show support for the concern that private voucher schools attract better teachers than public schools. However, the existence of the private voucher sector also draws higher productivity individuals into the teaching profession.




Research papers:


"Heterogeneous Peer Effects and Rank Concerns: Theory and Evidence"

HCEO Working Paper 2017-006

CESifo WP 6331

Download paper (January 2017)

Download Online Supplementary Material

Using a theoretical model where students care about achievement rank, I study effort choices in the classroom and show that rank concerns generate peer effects. The model's key empirical prediction is that the effect on own achievement of increasing the dispersion in peer cost of effort is heterogeneous, depending on a student's own cost of effort. To test this, I construct a longitudinal multi-cohort dataset of students, with data on the geographic propagation of building damages from the Chilean 2010 earthquake. I find that higher dispersion in home damages among one's classmates led, on average, to lower own Mathematics and Spanish test scores. To be able to test the theory, I develop a novel nonlinear difference-in-differences model that estimates effect heterogeneity and that relates observed damages to unobserved cost of effort. I find that some students at the tails of the predicted cost of effort distribution benefit from higher dispersion in peer cost of effort, as predicted by the theoretical model. This finding suggests that observed peer effects on test scores are, at least partly, governed by rank concerns.



"School Vouchers and the Joint Sorting of Students and Teachers"

(New version coming soon.)




"On the Nature of Social Interactions in Education: An Explanation for Recent Experimental Evidence"

(New version coming soon)

This paper presents a theoretical model of social interactions in education that can help us understand the (unexpected) outcomes of the United States Air Force Academy experiment in Carrell, Sacerdote, and West (2013), and the outcomes of a peer regrouping experiment at the Univeristy of Amsterdam (Booij, Leuven, Oosterbeek, 2016). A Monte Carlo experiment shows that inclusion of the variance of peer ability as a regressor in a reduced-form peer effect regression ensures good out-of-sample predictions when the data are generated from the model. In the model, students care about their achievement both in absolute terms and relative to the achievement of their peers. Comparative statics results show how changes in peer ability composition affect students' incentive to exert effort, providing an explanation for the striking experimental results. This finding indicates that the understudied channel of academic competition may affect the outcome of peer regrouping policies.


Work in progress:


"Self-confidence and the Gender Gap in Career Trajectories" (with Sarah Cattan)




Articles in Edited Volumes (not peer reviewed):


"Voting", with A. Penta, J. Pogach, A. Sandroni and D. Selman, in Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science, 2009, Springer