Sa'urday
Ok, they all finished last night and produced the expected set of results. That means I need to tune thermalisation, intensity plus a couple of shape factors using the data. Alan is away for a while, so won't get my hands on it for a few days unless I try to go through Ian F.
Need to do higher res stuff to get an idea of how well its all going on. I would expect twice the current resolution would do as medium resolution and quadruple it as high. So will prepare medium first... If this did go for a paper, there's a hell of a lot I could put in about the modelling.
This means altering the array size and the numbers included in the recording, readout etc etc etc etc etc etc...
55 => 110 at first, then 110 => 220. Could, if I was really determined, do ten times or whatever to get a smoothis profile, but redistribution would mean I start losing the lower intensity regions of the profile. We shall see how it all goes.
ok, have doubled the resolution, altered the results plotting out program to reflect this and set off all nine once again... lets get a better idea of what this model is producing...
Time to go!
Need to do higher res stuff to get an idea of how well its all going on. I would expect twice the current resolution would do as medium resolution and quadruple it as high. So will prepare medium first... If this did go for a paper, there's a hell of a lot I could put in about the modelling.
This means altering the array size and the numbers included in the recording, readout etc etc etc etc etc etc...
55 => 110 at first, then 110 => 220. Could, if I was really determined, do ten times or whatever to get a smoothis profile, but redistribution would mean I start losing the lower intensity regions of the profile. We shall see how it all goes.
ok, have doubled the resolution, altered the results plotting out program to reflect this and set off all nine once again... lets get a better idea of what this model is producing...
Time to go!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home