Couple 'a runs
Since Steve isn't in after all...
Two runs have finished overnight
Saturn50 finished the 50eV GS100m run. It was analysed, recoded as GS10m and set off again. No surprises or grade changes.
Saturn1000 finished the 100keV GS10m run. It was analysed, recoded as GS100m and set off again. No surprises or grade changes again.
Dealing with those wonderful cross-sections:
Straub et al 1996 - no further information to extract
Lindsay et al 2000 - dissociation cross-sections for NO, plus further references - mined
Mangan et al 2000 - CO dissociation cross-sections - mined
Deutsch et al 2002 - relevant to deeper model (ionisation of an ion)
Butler and Dalgarno 1979 - protons
Butler et al 1979 - protons
Bieniek and Dalgarno 1979 - protons
Tian and Vidal 1998 - information obtained
Tian and Vidal 1998a - relevant to deeper model, up to quadruple ionisation/dissociation
Tian and Vidal 1998b - relevant to deeper model with C2H2 and Ch4 cross-secs as well as CO
Tian and Vidal 1998c - CO2 dissociation - mined
Good, that's dissociation done as well as ionisation. Only require elastic scattering and maybe a few of the excitations to finish with.
Its amazing how large the NO dissociation cross-section is compared to its ionisation cross-section, compare to the disparity between say N2 or O2. Must be something to do with the heterogenaity of the atoms redistributing electron density unevenly across the bond. As ever.
Yep, same thing with the CO one.
Even worse for CO2, guess its because its polyatomic too.
So now have all appropriate dissociation and ionisation cross-sections, just missing elastic and (eventually) excitations, though the latter aren't necessary for immediate evaluations of the profiles.
Two runs have finished overnight
Saturn50 finished the 50eV GS100m run. It was analysed, recoded as GS10m and set off again. No surprises or grade changes.
Saturn1000 finished the 100keV GS10m run. It was analysed, recoded as GS100m and set off again. No surprises or grade changes again.
Dealing with those wonderful cross-sections:
Straub et al 1996 - no further information to extract
Lindsay et al 2000 - dissociation cross-sections for NO, plus further references - mined
Mangan et al 2000 - CO dissociation cross-sections - mined
Deutsch et al 2002 - relevant to deeper model (ionisation of an ion)
Butler and Dalgarno 1979 - protons
Butler et al 1979 - protons
Bieniek and Dalgarno 1979 - protons
Tian and Vidal 1998 - information obtained
Tian and Vidal 1998a - relevant to deeper model, up to quadruple ionisation/dissociation
Tian and Vidal 1998b - relevant to deeper model with C2H2 and Ch4 cross-secs as well as CO
Tian and Vidal 1998c - CO2 dissociation - mined
Good, that's dissociation done as well as ionisation. Only require elastic scattering and maybe a few of the excitations to finish with.
Its amazing how large the NO dissociation cross-section is compared to its ionisation cross-section, compare to the disparity between say N2 or O2. Must be something to do with the heterogenaity of the atoms redistributing electron density unevenly across the bond. As ever.
Yep, same thing with the CO one.
Even worse for CO2, guess its because its polyatomic too.
So now have all appropriate dissociation and ionisation cross-sections, just missing elastic and (eventually) excitations, though the latter aren't necessary for immediate evaluations of the profiles.
Labels: 100keV, 50eV, Cross-sections, GS, Mars, Saturn1000, Saturn50, Sensitivities
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home