We now show 8.3 that
, where
is the ground state (GS) density, is a unique functional of
. With this we mean that two non-trivially different external potentials (i.e. differing by more than a constant)
and
cannot produce the same GS density
. We will restrict ourselves to the case of non-degenerate GS in our proof. Consider the GS wavefunctions
and
of the systems with potentials
and
and suppose that they both produce the same GS density
. The GS energy
can be written using the compact notation:
Since the two wavefunctions
and
are the GS of two different potentials they are different 8.4, and so the variational principle implies:
giving
By virtue of exchanging the primed quantities with the non-primed ones we also obtain:
and by summing
and
we obtain:
proving that our assumption that
and
produce the same GS density is wrong. Therefore, there is a one-to-one correspondence not just between
and
, but also between the
and
, and therefore a one-to-one correspondence between
and
, which means that we can write
. Since
determines
, it also determines all the physical properties of the system, they are functionals of the GS density. In particular, the GS energy is a functional of
, as well as the kinetic and electron-electron interaction contributions:
The functional
does not depend on the external potential, and therefore it is a universal functional of the density. The unique correspondence between
and
also implies the usual variational principle, which in terms of the density reads: the ground state density is the one that minimises the energy functional, subject to the constraint that the total number of electrons is constant. We can use this principle to look for
, and if we knew the exact form of
we could solve the electronic problem for any external potential.
To find this constrained minimum we use the method of the Lagrange multipliers (see Appendix
). We define:
and we require:
which implies that both variations w.r.t.
and
have to be zero. The latter condition of course simply defines the constraint. Unfortunately
is not known, so an exact solution is still impossible. However, in the next section we will explore an approximate method, which also provides a working procedure to find the ground state density.