PLIN0068 Constructed Languages

2024-25

Lecture 8: Syntax

For the syntax of your language

  • No need to make syntactic rules for the entire language

  • Focus on some constructions, at least:

    1. Simple transitive sentences
    2. Simple intransitive sentences
    3. DPs (with recursion)
  • Be explicit about the syntactic rules (you can, but need not, formulate them as regular or context free production rules)

Simple transitive sentences

Word order of transitive sentences

Natural languages differ in word order

  • Some languages have flexible word order; other languages are more rigid
  • Many languages, if not all, have a dominant word order (see Dryer 2007:§2; Dryer 2013)
  • See Dryer 2013: Ch. 81 for quantitative data on simple transitive sentences

For your language

Determine how to say "[Name1] [Verb] [Name2]".

  • [Verb] should be a canonical transitive verb like "saw", "met", "pushed", etc.
  • SOV, SVO, VSO, VOS, OSV, OVS, or flexible word order

Optional: For 'non-canonical transitive verbs', you might have different structures (more on this later)

Dependency-marking

Once you've determined the order, also decide whether to mark grammatical dependency

  • Head-marking: e.g. subject marking in French

Marie

Marie

pouss-ait

push-imp.past.3sg

Paul

Paul

'Marie was pushing Paul'
  • Dependent-marking: e.g. case marking in Japanese

marī-ga

Marie-nom

pōru-o

Paul-acc

osi-tei-ta

push-prog-past

'Marie was pushing Paul'

Dependency-marking (cont.)

  • Both: e.g. Russian

Maria

Maria.nom

tolka-la

push.imp-past.3sg.f

Pola

Pol.acc

'Marie was pushing Paul'
  • Neither, e.g. Vietnamese

Maria

Maria

đẩy

push

Paul

Paul

'Marie pushes/ed Paul'

Complex head marking

Nez Perce (Deal 2010: p. 75)

pit'íin-im

girl-erg

páa-'yax̂-na

3subj.3obj-find-perf

picpíc-ne

cat-obj

'The girl found the cat'

Hungarian:

  • szeret-lek 'love-pres.1sgSubj2Obj'
  • szeret-ek 'love-pres.1sgSubj.indefObj', szeret-sz, 'love-pres.2sgSubj.indefObj',
  • szeret-em 'love-pres.1subj.defObj', szeret-ed 'love-pres.2sgSubj.defObj',

Remarks

  • Dependency is not always consistently marked
    • English head-marks 3sg subject on present verbs, but not in the past
    • English dependent-marks pronouns, but no other noun phrases
    • Japanese allows case markers to drop
  • Non-canonical transitive verbs
    • Object can be a PP ("listen" vs. "hear")
    • Some 'psych verbs' take Dative subject Nominative object
    • Irregular case assignment (e.g. helfen takes a Dative object in German)
    • Possession can be expressed by "[Nominative] be [Locative]"

Simple intransitive sentences

Word order of intransitive sentences

  • According to Dryer 2013 in most cases:

    • SV in SOV-SVO-OSV langauges
    • VS in VSO-VOS-OVS languages
  • But this correlation is not absolute, e.g.

    • Spanish is overwhelmingly SVO, but VS sentences are very common
    • Domari is overwhelmingly VS, but both SV and VS are found in transitive sentences

Ergativity

Another source of variation is ergativity (for dependent marking)

  • Nominative-Accusative alignment

    • Transitive: Nominative-subject Accusative-object
    • Intransitive: Nominative-subject
  • Ergative-Absolutive alignment

    • Transitive: Ergative-subject Absolutive-object
    • Intransitive: Absolutive-subject

(Nominative and Absolutive are often morphologically unmarked)

Ergativity: examples

Hunzib from Comrie 2013 (originally from Van den Berg 1995)

kid

girl

y-ut'-ur

cl2-sleep-past

'The girl slept'

oždi-l

boy-erg

kid

girl

hehe-r

hit-past

'The boy hit the girl'

Split ergativity

Many languages with ergative-absolute alignment also have nominative-accusative alignment

  • Hindi is ergative-absolute when V is perfective, but nominative-accusative when V is imperfective

  • In Georgian, only some intransitive verbs are ergative-absolutive

For your language

  • Determine the basic word order of intransitive sentences

  • If you have dependent marking, decide whether to have Nominative-Accusative or Ergative-Absolutive alignment

Pronouns

Pronominal typology

  • It's very common to mark singular vs. plural in 1st and 2nd person (Even languages that otherwise don't mark number do)

  • Some languages mark

    • Duality
    • Inclusive vs. exclusive 1st

Nominative pronouns in Hawai'ian

Augment-Minimal System

Ilocano pronouns (Bobaljik 2008, Cycsouw 2011, Harbour 2016)

Pronominal syntax

Pronouns often have special morphosyntax

  • Only pronouns have case distinctions in English
  • French is SVO, but SOV with pronominal/clitic objects
  • In Barasano, SV and VS are both possible, but pronominal S normally follows V (Dryer 2007)

For your language

You need to distinguish 1st vs. 2nd vs. 3rd

  • What number categories to have?

    • Sg. vs. Pl
    • Dual?
    • Inclusive/exclusive?
  • Other distinctions

    • Gender (only in 3sg in English; none in Uyghur, Hungarian)
    • Politeness (especially for 2nd person)

DPs

DP-internal material

Things to order: [Noun], [Article], [Demonstrative], [Numeral], [Adjective]

  • English has fixed order: ([Article],[Demonstrative]) [Numeral] [Adjective] [Noun]

  • Japanese has relatively flexible word order but [Noun] must be at the end

  • If all dependents appear on the same side of the noun (as in English), the order tends to be:

    • [Demonstrative]-[Numeral]-[Adjective]-[Noun]
    • [Noun]-[Adjective]-[Numeral]-[Demonstrative]

Articles and demonstratives

  • Some languages don't have articles (e.g., Cantonese, Russian)
  • [Article] and [Demonstrative] can be separate, e.g.
    • a gone yai 'the child this' in Fijian
    • aftos o andras 'dem the man'

Distinctions among demonstrative

  • English distinguishes proximal and distal demonstratives (this vs. that; cf. yon)
  • Three-way distinction in Spanish (este vs. ese vs. aquel), Japanese, etc.
  • No (strict) distinctions in French, Greek, etc.

Adjectives

  • No correlation between OV/VO and AdjN/NAdj (Dryer 2007: §7)

  • In Romance languages, some adjectives are pre-nominal, others are post-nominal

  • In some languages, adjectives are a subclass of verbs/predicates (Hanis Coos, Korean, Mandarin Chinese)

  • Some languages seem to lack attributive adjectives altogether (e.g. Korean, Japanese) and use (reduced) relative clauses instead

Numerals

  • No correlation between OV/VO and NumN/NNum (Dryer 2007)

  • Some languages require classifiers with numerals; numerals and classifiers are always adjecent (either NumCl or ClNum), so no order like (Num-N-Cl)

    • Num-Cl-N in Mandarin Chinese
    • N-Num-Cl in Thai
    • Cl-Num-N in Ibibio
    • N-Cl-Num in Jingpho
    • Both Num-Cl-N and N-Num-Cl in Japanese

Possessive constructions

English uses two types of possessive constructions:

  • the book's cover (Saxon genitive)
  • the cover of the book

In French, the possessor is normally post-nominal, but pronominal posessors are pre-nominal

  • le livre de Jean 'the book of Jean'
  • son livre '3sg's book'

Possessor agreement

English and French are dependent marking

Uyghur is obligatorily head-marking (possessor agreement)

  • (mëning) kitab-im '1sg.gen book-1sg'
  • (sëning) kitab-ing '2sg.gen book-2sg'

For your language

  • Determine how to say things like:

    • big cat/car
    • three cats/cars
    • three big cats/cars
    • these three big cats/cars
  • Word order can be flexible, but state which orders are possible

  • Determine how to form possessives (dependent marking and/or head marking) and where to place them; how to say e.g. this cat's three red cars

Summary

Homework

  1. Pronominal inventory

  2. Specify word order for transitive sentences, intransitive sentences, and DPs (remark if pronouns are special or not)

  3. Determine dependency-marking

  4. Construct 5 simple transitive and 5 intransitive sentences as examples

Presentation 2 in Week 10!

Other constructions

Optional constructions that you can discuss in your essay:

  • Adverbs
  • Auxiliary verbs
  • Polar questions
  • Wh-questions
  • Relative clauses
  • Modals and attitude constructions (How to embed sentences under must,, think, want etc.)