|
|
In the microcanonical ensemble the system has fixed energy , volume
and number of particles
. These are all quantities private to the system that are not exchanged with any reservoir. In the canonical ensemble we allow the energy to be exchanged with a heat bath, and the quantities that remain private to the system are the volume
and the number of particles
. The temperature
is also fixed, but it is not private, as it is determined by the heat bath. In the gran canonical ensemble we removed also the constraint on the number of particles, that can now be exchanged with the reservoir. The corresponding variable that is kept fixed is the chemical potential
, which again is determined by the reservoir, and the only variable that is still private to the system is its volume
. If we continue our generalisation and allow also the volume to change, in response to a pressure difference between the system and the reservoir, we lose the last variable private to the system, meaning that there is nothing we can use to identify the system and tell it apart from the reservoir, as all variables
,
and
are set by the reservoir. Note that these are all intensive variables, and so there is nothing to tell how big the system is, nothing to confine it. We therefore need to have at least one extensive variable still in play. Our last useful choice then would be to allow energy exchanges and volume changes but to keep the number of particles constant. This is the isothermal-isobaric ensemble, characterised by constant
. Here
is private to the system, and
and
are set by the reservoir by the condition of equilibrium. Following on the discussions of the previous sections it will be no surprise to find that the isothermal-isobaric probability distribution for the microstates is:
As for the Boltzmann and the Gibbs probabilities, if the energy levels have degeneracy
, and
, the probability for the system to have energy
is: